In this article
The short answer: The hallmarks of aging are a framework from aging biologists that groups the cellular and molecular changes that accompany growing older into a short list. The 2013 version had nine hallmarks; a 2023 update expanded it to twelve (López-Otín et al., 2013; López-Otín et al., 2023). The list is a map of mechanisms, not a checklist for you to fix one by one. Most of what is known about reversing individual hallmarks comes from cells and animals. In people, the practical levers are the familiar ones that act on several hallmarks at once: regular exercise, adequate sleep, a sustainable diet, and not smoking.
- 01Definition
- 02The Twelve
- 03Evidence
- 04Influence
- 05Misconception
- 06What To Do
- 07FAQ
- 08Key Takeaways
- 09References
What Are the Hallmarks of Aging?
The hallmarks of aging are a classification of the biological processes that change as organisms age and that appear to drive age-related decline. Carlos López-Otín and colleagues proposed the first list in Cell in 2013 to give the field a shared vocabulary (López-Otín et al., 2013). To qualify, a process should show up during normal aging, worsen aging when experimentally made worse, and slow aging when experimentally improved. Few candidates meet all three tests in every species, which is why the authors called the original list tentative.
1. It appears with age
The change is measurable and tends to grow as organisms get older.
2. Worsening it speeds aging
Experimentally aggravating the process accelerates age-related decline.
3. Fixing it slows aging
Therapeutic correction should slow, halt, or partly reverse the aging process.
This framework sits underneath the idea of geroscience, the argument that targeting the biology of aging could delay many chronic diseases together (Kennedy et al., 2014). For the outcome those mechanisms feed into, see what healthspan means and why it matters more than lifespan.
What Are the Twelve Hallmarks?
The 2013 paper listed nine hallmarks in three groups: causes of damage, the body's responses to damage, and the end results that show up as decline. The 2023 update kept those nine and added three: disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis, meaning a disturbed gut microbiome (López-Otín et al., 2023).
The twelve hallmarks, grouped
Primary: sources of damage
Genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, and disabled macroautophagy (the last was added in 2023).
Antagonistic: responses that turn harmful
Deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cellular senescence. These start as protective responses and become damaging when chronic.
Integrative: the visible consequences
Stem cell exhaustion and altered intercellular communication, plus chronic inflammation and dysbiosis from the 2023 update.
Several of these have their own guides on Protocol: senescent cells, epigenetic age, and NAD+ and mitochondrial function. The hallmarks interact, so damage in one area often feeds another. Treating the list as twelve independent targets misreads how the authors framed it.
How Strong Is the Evidence That You Can Change Them?
It varies a lot by hallmark, and it is much stronger in animals than in people. The clearest example is cellular senescence. Baker and colleagues (2016) used a genetic switch to clear p16Ink4a-positive cells from mice starting at one year of age. Treated mice lived longer than controls, and several organs showed less age-related deterioration. That is a proof of concept in mice, not a treatment available to people. For humans, the main randomized signal comes from calorie restriction. In the CALERIE trial, two years of sustained calorie restriction slowed the DunedinPACE pace-of-aging measure compared with controls, but did not significantly change two other epigenetic clocks, and the authors described the effects as small (Waziry et al., 2023).
Cells and worms
Many hallmarks can be manipulated here, and lifespan effects are common. These results often fail to carry over.
Mice
Clearing senescent cells extended lifespan in one well known study (Baker et al., 2016). Mice live a few years and differ from people in many ways.
Humans
Evidence is mostly observational or based on surrogate markers such as epigenetic clocks, not on proven extra years of healthy life.
Caveat: a marker is not the outcome
Epigenetic clocks and similar readouts are surrogates. A change in a clock does not by itself show that you will stay healthy longer.
Which Hallmarks Can You Actually Influence?
Realistically, you influence them indirectly, through habits that touch several hallmarks at once. This table is a hedged map of plausible links, not a promise. These are general associations from the wider research literature, and the strength of evidence differs for each row. The habits themselves have the most consistent human support: in two large US cohorts, five low-risk habits (not smoking, healthy weight, regular activity, moderate alcohol, better diet) were linked to many more years free of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes (Li et al., 2020).
Habits and the hallmarks they plausibly touch
Regular exercise
Plausibly relevant to mitochondrial function, nutrient sensing, and chronic inflammation. Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is also tied to lower mortality (Mandsager et al., 2018).
Sleep and stress regulation
Plausibly relevant to chronic inflammation and cellular repair. Evidence is largely observational.
Diet quality and energy balance
Plausibly relevant to nutrient sensing, the gut microbiome (dysbiosis), and body composition.
Not smoking
Tobacco damages DNA and drives inflammation, so it plausibly acts on genomic stability and chronic inflammation.
For the fitness side of this picture, read why VO2 max predicts how long you will live.
What Is the Most Common Misconception?
That the hallmarks are a to-do list, with a supplement or protocol for each one. The framework describes where aging biology shows up, not which products work.
Common misconception
"If a hallmark can be reversed in mice, a supplement can reverse it in me." Mouse results are a starting point for human trials, and most have not been confirmed in people.
What Should You Do With This?
Use the framework to understand why basic habits matter, then put your effort where the human evidence is strongest.
Start with the habits
Regular activity, sleep, a sustainable diet, and no smoking act on several hallmarks together and have more consistent human evidence than single-target products.
Treat single-hallmark products with caution
Be skeptical of any product claiming to reverse one hallmark. Ask what human outcome was measured.
Track outcomes, not slogans
Fitness, strength, sleep, and routine blood markers tell you more than a hallmark label.
Talk to a clinician
Before trying a drug or high-dose supplement, discuss it with someone who knows your history.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many hallmarks of aging are there?
The original 2013 framework had nine. A 2023 update from the same group expanded it to twelve by adding disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis (López-Otín et al., 2013; López-Otín et al., 2023).
Who proposed the hallmarks of aging?
Carlos López-Otín, Maria Blasco, Linda Partridge, Manuel Serrano, and Guido Kroemer, in a 2013 review in Cell, updated in 2023.
Can you reverse the hallmarks of aging?
Some have been slowed or partly reversed in cells and animals, for example by clearing senescent cells in mice (Baker et al., 2016). Proven reversal in people, with real health benefits, has not been established.
Does calorie restriction slow aging in humans?
In the CALERIE trial, two years of calorie restriction slowed one epigenetic measure of the pace of aging, with small effects and no significant change in two other clocks (Waziry et al., 2023). It does not show longer life.
What is the best practical way to act on the hallmarks?
Focus on exercise, sleep, diet quality, a healthy weight, and not smoking. These affect several hallmarks at once, and the lifestyle evidence in people is among the most consistent (Li et al., 2020).
What to remember
The short version.
- 1The hallmarks of aging are a framework of shared biological changes in aging, first listed as nine in 2013 and expanded to twelve in 2023 (López-Otín et al., 2013; López-Otín et al., 2023).
- 2The 2023 update added disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis.
- 3Most evidence for reversing individual hallmarks comes from cells and animals, such as senescent cell clearance in mice (Baker et al., 2016).
- 4In people, two years of calorie restriction slowed one epigenetic pace-of-aging measure, with small effects (Waziry et al., 2023).
- 5Habit-based levers have the most consistent human support (Li et al., 2020; Mandsager et al., 2018).
- 6Treat the list as a map of mechanisms, not a shopping list.
Keep reading
Related on Protocol
LearnLongevity
What Healthspan Means and Why It Matters More Than Lifespan
The outcome the hallmarks feed into.
LearnHealth
What Senescent Cells Are and Why Clearing Them Matters for Longevity
One hallmark in depth.
LearnHealth
What Epigenetic Age Means and Whether You Can Actually Reverse It
How clocks relate to the hallmarks.
Protocol
Track the habits that move the needle.
Protocol puts your sleep, HRV, resting heart rate, and training in one place so you can see long-run direction against your own baseline.
Get started freeReferencesSources
Key Studies
- Baker et al. (2016) Nature, volume 530, pages 184 to 189. Naturally occurring p16Ink4a-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan in mice.
- Waziry et al. (2023) Nature Aging, volume 3, pages 248 to 257. Effect of long-term caloric restriction on DNA methylation measures of biological aging in the CALERIE trial.
- Li et al. (2020) BMJ, volume 368, l6669. Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy free of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes.
- Mandsager et al. (2018) JAMA Network Open, volume 1, issue 6, e183605. Cardiorespiratory fitness and long-term mortality.
Frameworks
- López-Otín et al. (2013) Cell, volume 153, issue 6, pages 1194 to 1217. The hallmarks of aging: the original nine.
- López-Otín et al. (2023) Cell, volume 186, issue 2, pages 243 to 278. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe, the twelve-hallmark update.
- Kennedy et al. (2014) Cell, volume 159, issue 4, pages 709 to 713. Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease.